Subject	yeah no shit. I was just specifing which model it was (n/m)
Posted by	SnowManZ on February 11, 2006 at 1:03 AM
	This message has been viewed 20 times.
In Reply To	soarer != SC430, soarer = sc300, sc400 (n/m) posted by Atl300zxTT on February 10, 2006 at 12:32 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Twin Supercharged Z? - 4seaterneeder 19:51:48 02/09/06 Wied no message when you click on the post BUT... - Patrick(Austin) 19:54:40 02/09/06 it would be cheaper to just do the tt swap..... (n/m) - dabigstalion 20:03:25 02/09/06 lets see it done, as far as i know its never been done. - SnowManZ 20:05:03 02/09/06 soarer != SC430, soarer = sc300, sc400 (n/m) - Atl300zxTT 12:32:24 02/10/06 yeah no shit. I was just specifing which model it was (n/m) - SnowManZ 01:03:44 02/11/06 Re: Twin Supercharged Z? - racer2fst 20:11:40 02/09/06 If you cant do a TT swap - ben7021 20:12:12 02/09/06 Change the interior? - 90Z-NA (ATL) 20:20:58 02/09/06 For the cost of that project...you could have TWO Zs... - BradZ (FL) 20:25:55 02/09/06 yeah, so my pulley idea was wrong - VG30DE racer 21:26:57 02/09/06 lol - ZLover4Life 20:33:57 02/09/06 Also, why twin SC's? - 90Z-NA (ATL) 20:47:22 02/09/06 True.... - stickeefingerz (Cali) 01:22:49 02/10/06 to me, it seems as if you want to do this CHEAPLY. - Shawn300zTT GT28R MD 20:58:36 02/09/06 agreed (n/m) - mousersix (San Antonio) 23:30:25 02/09/06 Turbos u need two of them But for a sC Go with one - FLzx(2+2 TT) 21:28:33 02/09/06 Its "Moronic" - Ballistic 22:21:51 02/09/06 over simplification on the 2 weeks, $3K total =P (n/m) - stockplayerz (NYC) 09:04:26 02/10/06 it's quite moronic. - Spee 02:09:07 02/10/06 I have also given this some thought...not because I - CRAZZEPETE. 09:03:21 02/10/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.